We dedicate the letter below to Mr Johan M.   R. Foenander an alleged Christian. He attempted to secure, from Andrew Yiannides, a Statement with Half Truths with suppression of the core elements, relative to the activities he was noted to have been a promoter user & an overzealous participating fraudster in. He was working with others for the imposition of the constructive fraud  we point to and cover in explicit pages [*Page1] [*Page2]) Others were noted to be co-operating with him for and ONLY TOWARDS the IMPLEMENTATION of the blunt and arrogant constructive frauds, on the taxpayers, through abuse of the courts, as covered in our pages. [*Link from here to the page where we cover his parts & point to relative evidence. *Link from here to another page where we cover his part in the creation of material he & his partner asserted was intended for use at court, when in reality it was all but a smokescreen and blunt misrepresentations & a case of  'Dust in your eyes, suckers', for the persons targeted with such ploys'.

In 1996 the letter below was confirmed received, after pointing out past failures by the Home Office / Secretary to concern themselves with the issues raised. Read the letter and relate to events and activities you, visitor / victim may have experienced personally.

Q: WHO responsible for the police?
A: The Home Secretary.

YET we have charlatans and mischief makers promoting whatever the managers & controllers of CIUKU Enterprises pre-ordained for the serfs. [*Link from here to an example from and about an alleged victim, how he acted / behaved towards us. The documented evidence ESTABLISHES that he was more than just selfish, for IF HE WAS GENUINE he would have co-operated instead of running around promoting the powers that be, the abuse of judicial chair occupation by the type of judges he allegedly was complaining about. IN FACT HE WAS just PROMOTING THE EVIL ACTIVITIES he had been subjected to, care of 'the ploy of subliminal indoctrination of others he was targeting as a corrupted frausdsters club recruit [*L]. Clue? The dreamer / fraud of an alleged human, WAS NOT PREPARED, NOR WILLING TO EXPOSE & CHALLENGE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN THE ABUSERS OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, just like the rest of the fraudsters he was rubbing shoulders with; one and all collectively promoting the practices we are exposing and challenging in our pages).

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess.  You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

The Home Office

and the Home Secretary

The above realities are but the practices and the activities many complain of in private and or speak of to 'victims of the system' whom they are pointed to (by the legal circles and their agents) and they target in order to use them / put them on track FOR THE BENEFITS awaiting those who keep it all in the family closet..... SUPPRESS IT ALL FROM THE TAXPAYERS!!! Such was and remains the situation with those we are exposing, naming and shaming. Such, also, has been the state with a multitude of others who seek to play the field as arranged by the legal circles and alleged 'servants of the law and the public'. [*Link from here to a list of specific paragraphs in pages where we cover the state of affairs]

The days of public servants relying on the BLIND DEAF AND DUMB MEDIA ARE OVER. The days when ALL relied on BLIND DEAF AND DUMB officers within the law enforcement agencies are also over. This is the age of FREE exchange of information and THE unadulterated FACTS OF LIFE within all states, so long as their citizens are free to exercise AS WE DO, their basic human-rights which ARE GUARANTEED under the European Convention on Human Rights . (ECoHR)  [Below the introduction of the Human Rights Act. From here *Link to HOW and under what circumstances the government was caused to announce the introduction of the Act in 1997. When there read ALL of the appeal and the explicit affidavit in the page] 

The attempts by Lord Irvine, the ex Lord Chancellor, to create a supper Ministry WAS A DANGER TO DEMOCRACY and especially so, when he was in charge of persons who were/are of the opinion that they were appointed, by 'their God' to be the modern day 'Lords and Masters' of 'the serfs', in this one's great nation. [*Link from here to the root of it all] We are in no doubt that such is the case in other lands, too. So long as our judges are free and shall remain free to indulge and practice their corrupted law, unsupervised, unchecked, uncontrolled and acting, as they please, in breach of the laws of our Parliament and in violation of human rights, Democracy [*Link from here to definition] is in mortal danger.

From the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights (1948) we point to:-

Article 6.1.  "In the determination of his civil RIGHTS and OBLIGATIONS or of any criminal charges against him, EVERYONE is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal .... judgement shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial (hearing) in the interest of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society ...interests of juveniles... protection of the private life of the parties... where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice." and under

Article 6.2.  "EVERYONE charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law." and under

Article 6.3. "EVERYONE..... has the following minimum rights (a) to be informed promptly.... in detail ... nature and cause of charges against him .... (b) adequate time,... facilities.. to prepare his defence.... (c) to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing free legal assistance in the interests of justice if he has not sufficient means to pay... (d) to examine of have examined witnesses against him ..to obtain attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;    and (e)  to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language use in court."

Article 8.1.  "EVERYONE has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

Article 8.2.  "THERE SHALL BE NO interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right ..except in accordance with the law .. necessary in a democratic society..  interests of national security... public safety... economic well being of the country... the prevention of disorder or crime... the protection of health or morals or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others." This is the most abused and breached piece of legislation by the organisers and managers of the CIUKU Enterprises:-

• Our Masters and Lords seek to, and impose many a criminal act.
• They do so through breaches of national law.
• By relying upon, and using the 'subordinates created by the state'.
• Those subordinates, as Public Servants, are also independent of the law - criminals'.
• They are assured, by the controllers of it all, that 'No prosecutions are ever likely to be instigated, against them'.
• Just AS IN THE NATIONAL SCANDAL scenarios.Forgeries used for the theft of funds belonging to third parties with plenty of FALSE INSTRUMENTS that lack accountability, as issued by persons in judicial office.
• Officers of Law bluntly endorsing and promoting the criminal activities of public servants.
• Collectively acting in contempt of the law as authorised and licensed, by our representatives in government, to act so, for the implementation of CRIMES INTENDED thus LEADING TO THE NEW CODE OF MORALS, hatched up in secret sessions by the abductors of Democracy, attended by the MEDIA barons and their editors.
• The theft and misappropriation of Housing Benefit funds.
• Criminal activities in pursuit of organised multiple frauds on the public at large.
• Forgeries used and no prosecutions because of the plan and the funds needed in order to create a melting pot.
• All through arrogant interference in the affairs of other countries.
• Criminals who steal from their masters (the citizens / taxpayers) in allegedly civilised states, resting and founded allegedly on principles of law and order.
• Public SERVANTS indulging in blunt crime at the expense of their employers, Mr & Mrs Average.
• And they dare determine how other countries and nations should run their own societies and affairs.
• Our Lords and Masters wishing to play Godfather to the world.
• They are not simply interfering in other countries.
• As part of their master plan, THEY ARE BREAKING UP FAMILIES THROUGH ORGANISED FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES in their own countries.(*Link to site for connection to family issues).
• Plenty of breaches of national law and gross violations of international treaties and accords. [*Link to PLEADED VIOLATIONS as lodged at the European Court of Human Rights]
• Criminal activities by the very guardians of 'the Law', OUR SERVANTS, who are retained by our representatives in government, persons who are 'elected, care of the media barons, 'through frauds'.
• OUR AGENTS acting and operating in government and states, which they misrepresent as alleged Democracies that, allegedly, rest and are founded on law and order. Public servants, acting, as ABSOLUTE DICTATORS, in contempt of all law and the rights of the citizens.
• They do it all through the media barons and their stooges, with plenty of theatre, from 'intellectual prostitutes'.

To the well known quote by Abraham Lincoln we add, for the benefit of the abductors of Justice and Democracy, our founder's 'addenda', the fourth, dimension below:

• "You can fool all of the people for some of the time".
• "You can fool some of the people for all of the time".
• "You cannot fool all of the people, all of the time".
• We add "AND there are some people YOU can never fool at any time".

Article 13 is VERY CLEAR. WHERE IS THE NATIONAL AUTHORITY THAT LOOKS INTO THE VIOLATIONS judges in the United Kingdom endorse, entertain AND INSTIGATE of their own?  The question is simple and the Lord Chancellor with the Home Secretary should co-operate and produce the formula under which the citizens CAN challenge activities that blatantly breach national law and VIOLATE Human Rights. Converting the properties of others to alleged legal costs attached to fraudulent court proceedings is the worst anathema the United Kingdom is plagued with. One could not expect a clearer and more succinct a situation of abuses of court 'facilities' than in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven cases. WE have other cases on file. Where is the authority to investigate and prosecute the offenders?
(Answer: SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS HAVE BEEN ACTING IN CONTEMPT of the provision, allegedly signed for by OUR REPRESENTATIVES IN GOVERNMENT, as our agents on behalf of the Head of State, the king / queen. We now ask you to READ OF THE, undisclosed & unpublicised, ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE, whereby judicial chair occupants ARE USED in order to impose the state of dictatorships that the founder of human-rights.org first spoke and wrote of, over 34 years ago. Such has been the case in ALL  pseudo-democracies where Intellectual Prostitutes* [*Link to definition] are maintained by the invisible string pullers (of puppets) and manipulators (of puppets) in order to misinform the ill-educated 'serfs' and 'shitizens', NON-THINKERS who ARE SUBJECTED to permanent brain washing and subliminal indoctrination as organised by the evil ones who have been in control of ALL pseudo-democracies for centuries and NOW SEEK TOTAL CONTROL OF PLANET EARTH).  

Article 14.  "The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any grounds such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status."

My Ref.: CJEGSO93
Your Ref.: Minorities/fact finding missions

25th October 1993
Recorded Delivery
Encl.

STRICTLY PERSONAL

Honourable Sir

Your recent statements as regards tensions and emotions which rest on attitudes and mentalities that produced East London marchers and confrontations are admirable and indeed a step in the right direction

I would be failing myself, my family and my neighbours if not other citizens, if I did not submit to you the attached extract from a case history of true events which you should, and I implore you to, read without fail.

You will note, that in a simple matter of breach of contract between two persons of different backgrounds and origins, elements which subsequently entered into the arena were simply introduced, perpetrated, promoted and even worse furtherance of such mentalities and attitudes were attempted to by none other than those upon whom society at large seeks and relies for their rights in law, both National and international.

Sir, at the County Court, where the documents (Public Records) are filed, in the Defence and Counter Claim which was the only avenue open to me (after I was denied and obstructed by a young policeman the address proper of the offending building contractor) I clearly pleaded the fact that my family and I happen to live in the same road as the brother in law of that offending building contractor. And our relationship has been nothing else but that of good neighbours, never marred even by the events arising out of Court proceedings and the mentality and attitudes of the police, Court staff and Officers.

In letters, subsequently sent to my Member of Parliament I raised the serious issues of denial of rights and the repeated attempts to deny and obstruct Justice in furtherance of the young police constable’s blatant favouritism and the introduction of racial discrimination. The acts and mentality of the police constable were pleaded in my Defence and Counter Claim without making him party to the proceedings and or any claim having been made in respect of those causes of action. It was a deliberate and by necessity calculated act on my part, because of past failures by the police to exercise their Public Duties without any hint of favouritism and or discrimination. The sole purpose of my pleadings was meant to indicate and state to the Court as to how a contract gone sour was turned into something of an abhorrent nature and outside the law by none others but those who are meant to enforce the Law and protect the citizens. Sir, you will not fail to note the obvious and blatant attempts, by those who are meant to uphold and apply Parliament’s Laws and the State’s Commitments to the International Community. They, in their turn, sought to promote the initial acts and Breaches of Public Duty by a Public Servant in furtherance of their own in order to create conditions upon which that young police constable might or could have been forgiven and or absolved of any responsibility by his failures and his blatant abuse of public office in furtherance of his personal own choices and in contravention of the Law.

Sir, if public servants see fit to act as the persons depicted in the submitted true and factual case history, and their respective Superiors do themselves ignore the complaints raised and made of the respective departments; and it is immaterial if there exist loopholes and or break-downs in the line of commands but there subsists nothing but dereliction of Public Duty where and how does the average citizen seek redress IF THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF LAW AND ORDER ARE THEMSELVES GUILTY of such acts?

Sir, it was indeed remarkable that a Parliamentary Secretary to the Lord Chancellor's Department, in a reply to my Member of Parliament, sought to cover up the failures of County Court staff and officers with the utterances that my complaints were allegedly investigated WHILST ELECTING TO IGNORE THE EXISTENCE OF SOUND RECORDINGS; I was not informed that I was to be treated as I was; so why should I fore-warn anybody?

I would like to add, that even though I did reverse an improper1y entered judgement against me and eventually judgement was entered for me, nonetheless the culprit and rogue contractor HAD AND DID THREATEN ME, MY WIFE AND OUR CHILDREN. He did indulge in criminal acts AFTER HE HAD BEEN ENCOURAGED BY THE YOUNG POLICEMAN. Only a fool would put his life, his family and his properties at risk BECAUSE THE POLICE FAILED TO PROSECUTE THE PERSON THEY TOOK UNDER THEIR WING AND ENCOURAGED THROUGHOUT. So what use is a judgement against a person who appears to had been guided and motivated into criminal acts because of encouragement by those who ought to know better?

OUR LAW ENFORCING AGENCIES!

May I add that in so far as there exist reasons advanced and promoted by those in charge of our L.E.A’s that our Judiciary are and should be Independent, that THAT INDEPENDENCE SHOULD BE NOTHING ELSE BUT INDEPENDENCE TO ENTER AND MAKE JUDICIOUS DECISIONS founded and resting on the facts of each case and in furtherance of Law Enforcement. NOT INDEPENDENCE TO INDULGE IN LAW BREAKING. In a letter to my M.P years ago I stated, "Evidently if a judge be drunk, in charge of a vehicle, going through red traffic lights, causing an accident with damages to properties and loss of life, that judge CAN BE PROSECUTED. But if drunk with the powers of his position HE CANNOT!". Also in a letter to the Lord Chancellor I stated, "Can you imagine the state of British Industry if one and all were free to indulge and left to their own devices, unsupervised and uncontrolled?" Is the only remedy open to the public, Appeals Galore And By The Score all the way to Strasbourg, provided the citizen aggrieved has funds and millions to spend with, on and in questionable Legal Services, who after all appear to be nothing else but self perpetuating Law Breakers. AND I HAVE EVIDENCE (all overseas) which the Police ignore whilst the Director of Public Prosecutions and his department state that it is a matter for the police. PASS THE BUCK! OSTRICH ACTS!

I look forward to your response to my letter and your reactions to the facts related in The Breeding Grounds Case. Years ago, after I was taken to the cleaners (so to speak) through corrupt and criminal abuses of our Legal System, I decided that the only true remedy for the public at large was to expose the practices and the systematic abuses by the legal circles through a book, hence the use of the word case. (there are others) Of recent times two dear old ladies, Miss Mary Winch and Miss Peggy Wood have had their tribulations, at the hands of our Legal System, aired by the media. I do feel that it is time some Senior Officers and or Minister particularly your office Sir, took the matters, which I and many others have been raising for many years, to task.

As to the matters raised because of failures and the conscious acts by those responsible for the welfare and well being of all citizens irrespective of race, creed and  or colour, may I now raise a question with you and your office, Honourable Sir, If such persons sought to act in the manners that they did (at least those in the stated case) towards me, a person of white Christian European origins, what of their mentality and attitude towards the citizens of other origins? And who and how, if not from your office, are we to stop the promotion if not the escalation of the events in East London when there appears to exist no real desire to stop at source since those upon whom society at large relies, do themselves fail society and themselves indulge in law breaking?"

Yours Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides
65 Abbot's Park Road
London E1O 6HU

Attach Copy of extracts from ‘The Breeding Grounds Case’

FOOTNOTE:
Footnote eXtra: In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that the y, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a)  the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides]. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link* [*L] from here to the letter] and note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob].
    1.   It is imperative the reader / visitor realises that the issues we cover and point to are very simple, in ALL GENUINE DEMOCRATIC STATES. The citizens elect persons they wish to represent them in government. The REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITIZENS (do access the words of Oliver Cromwell when he dismissed the deputies of the people) THEN CREATE LAW recorded as Acts of Parliament. The very Acts and Statutory Instruments (the latter are issued by Ministers) are intended TO PROTECT THE CITIZENS FROM CRIME & CRIMINALS and to assure / guarantee to citizens THEIR RIGHTS (do access a simple compilation of the most fundamental of rights for genuine democratic states). THE LEGAL PROFESSIONS AND THE COURTS / JUDICIARY are meant TO SERVE THE CITIZENS BY APPLYING THEIR KNOWLEDGE OF THE  LAW, in accordance with the facts stated and proven as true and relevant to any case and complaint raised in the first instance or before a court of law. Visitors, readers and researchers are urged to access the words of the French Jurist, Charles Louis Montesquieu in the quotes page. When in the page all should scroll up and access the words attributed to Jesus Christ by the creators / editors of the New Testament (circa early 4th Century Anno Domini). Mankind benefited from wise counsel through the promotion of the realities attributed to Jesus Christ some 1700 years ago. Such indeed was the case also in the 6th century BC; access and READ of Justice as of then, by scrolling up to Aeschylus.
    2.   The principle from which visitors, readers & researchers are directed here (from above), with our complements to the corrupted. To all converts 'to the system as is'; to the lovers of the constructive frauds on the taxpayers which realities we cover in the exclusive page we point to from here. Access and read of the realities we expose and consider, as taxpayers, the arrogant fraud on the taxpayers; consider also, that NOT ONE OF THE ALLEGED VICTIM-CHALLENGERS WE NAME IN OUR PAGES, ever addressed the organised fraud on the taxpayers. Every one we name and expose in our pages, also MANY OTHER ALLEGED CHALLENGER-VICTIMS, defaulted, not for fear of repercussions, but because NONE WISHED OR DESIRED TO DRAW ATTENTION TO THE FACILITIES THEY FELL IN LOVE WITH, as converts to it all and as maintenance engineers / users of 'the system as is'; precisely what has been the case with the persons we name and expose.
   3.  The case referred to in the introduction to the Home Office responsibilities (above) was used in pleadings at the High Court (RCJ). The submissions were lodged for and in respect of the case of a targeted 'son of some man', a discarded dildo. Find out how and under what circumstances we referred to the 'stated case' in the course of Mr Len Miskulin's tribulations. He elected to vanish into obscurity but somehow either he or some other has been maintaining the web-site he set up in order to challenge and expose those who imposed on him their evil ways, the torment and torture he was being subjected to, by the legal circles who always use 'gestation vessels' (motherhood) as their reasons for 'acting in contempt of THE PRINCIPLE OF THE ASSURED, in International Law, EQUALITY OF THE SEXES. Access from here the explicit challenges and submissions that were lodged at court. The PRECEDENT CASE AS STATED / PLEADED and pointed to, to the court and to the abusers of the courts' processes should assist victims of the rampant fraud through the courts to recognise WHY as long ago as 1981, Mr Andrew Yiannides was advocating the creation of the Citizens' Alternative Precedent case records - data for use by the citizens who have had enough of the theatrical productions from and by abusers of the courts facilities and indulge as we expose in the exclusive page [*Link] where we address the element of the sold to the devil souls.
    4.   The bank's participation in ORGANISED CRIMES AGAINST THE CITIZENS (pardon, just another 'serf' in the instance at hand) was discovered decades later. The bank's officers were party to an undisclosed, unjustified and inexcusable charge on a property by the fraudsters operating out of the Inland Revenue. The undisclosed, by the bank, charge by the Inland Revenue was entered, by the IR, on top of a fraudulent, in essence, and inexcusable demand by the Inland Revenue. Victims of Inland Revenue malpractice, readers and researchers should *Link from here to a letter sent to an accountant many decades later AFTER THE CHARGE WAS DISCLOSED by and uncovered in the course of a visit to the Land Registry as deposed of on affidavit, the execution of which the deponent delayed, with intent, for almost four years.
    5.   Reference above (Footnote number 4) to an undisclosed charge on a property, relates to a charge which officers of Lloyds Bank plc., as trusted holders of the Deeds to the property, allowed. No 'decent human' (thinker who is given the full facts and the background) can possibly ignore the fact that the agents and officers of Lloyds Bank plc.CONVENIENTLY FAILED TO DISCLOSE, to the victim-serf, THE CHARGE BY THE INLAND REVENUE. The Manager in charge of the branch handling the accounts of the targeted victim-serf was fully aware of the criminal activities the legal circles indulged in at the client's expense. The Bank, through the Manager's records, were aware of the plans of the victim-serf, because he was kept informed throughout of such matters. There existed substantive reasons why the victim-serf did not proceed with the removal of the first charge by the bank after the loan account that warranted the charge, by the bank, was paid off. The bank was in the position of trust and the UNDISCLOSED CHARGE must have been behind other questionable acts by other bank managers, almost two decades later. At the time of the questionable activities by the staff and officers of Lloyds-TSB plc, new judicial chair occupants had entered the scenarios through an orchestrated and organised assault, on the family the victim-serf had created and maintained for years. All in good time, fellow victims of the Organised FRAUD ON Mr & Mrs Average. THE CORRUPTION OF CITIZENS in our allegedly civilised pseudo-democracy are soundly covered in our pages. In our pages EXPOSED SOME OF THE CORRUPTED WHO FELL IN LOVE WITH THE ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE FOR RAMPANT FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS. The named 'morons' we expose RECKLESSLY SUPPRESSED & CARRY ON SUPPRESSING the realities of life within an allegedly democratic state. Many the victims of crime who APPEAR TO HAVE CAPITULATED TO BLACKMAIL (those who simply go for the cash under the table) AND WITH INTENT FAIL TO REPORT THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES THEY WERE SUBJECTED TO, SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY FELL IN LOVE WITH THE ORGANISED FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS & JOIN IN THE ACTIVITIES AS PROMOTERS & MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS WHO OBJECT TO ANY INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP OF VICTIMS WHO ACTIVELY ENGAGE IN CHALLENGING & EXPOSING IT ALL TO THE TAXPAYERS.
    6.   *Link from here to elements from the past as promoted by the followers of the peddlers who first conceived the system of dictatorships through judges, and after reading of the recorded operations, recognise the extent of the work warranted after an allegedly Honourable Officer of the Supreme Court -a solicitor- indulged in the promotion of a blunt FORGERY THROUGH WHICH HE ATTEMPTED TO CAUSE HIS CLIENT, the creator of these pages, an old school friend and victim of FRAUD, to abandon his legitimate and open & shut case against the offending fraudsters the solicitor and the barrister he retained / instructed instigated legal proceedings against. 
    7.   *Access from here the document we put together for use by the wronged and victims of persons who abuse position of authority, such as public servants and or anyone who purportedly was / is serving citizen / taxpayer who were / are wronged, defrauded of rights and properties. *Access also from here  xxx
    8.   *Access from here the page where we publish a precedent case relative to a police officer who defaulted / failed to execute his duties as an officer of Justice / of the law. After he was pronounced guilty of misconduct in public office, he appealed but failed to have the court's (jury's) decision reversed by the Court of Appeal, where their Lordships deliberated on the issues that arose as a consequence of the police officer's 'breaches of public duty'. We urge persons who visit the page & read the precedent case, TO TAKE ON BOARD THE ELEMENTS USED, BY THE POLICE OFFICERS LEGAL TEAM, when challenging the jury's decision, before their Lordships at the Court of Appeal. We further urge visitors to *access from here the page where we raise our objections to the very live elements attached to the criminal activities used for the implementation of the RAMPANT FRAUD & CORRUTION orgnaised and processed through abuse of the courts facilities, in our / all allegedly civilised pseudodemocracies. *Access also from here a House of Lords precedent case which Andrew kept up his sleeves from 1975 to March 2008. Throughout the years, Andrew researching and investigating the criminal activities ongoing IN THE COURTS with the blessings of the police, the judiciary and Ministers of Justice -Lord Chancellors- of all political colorations. And worse with blunt participation in the promotion of the practice by persons who discarded / dispense with any moral consciousness they might have benefited from at some time in their existence among other alleged humans : thinkers. We refer to purported / assumed users of any grey matter they may have been gifted with, by the creator sold to the ill-educated and the ill-informed 'sons of men on planet earth', as promoted and sold to the naive and gullible by the agents and followers of the creator they adopted as their God. *Access from here a typical examples of the Messages delivered and promoted, as Holy Scriptures, to the naive and gullible by the followers of such evil examples taught, promoted and  &  
    9.   xxx
   10.  xxx
   11.  xxx