h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

[*Link from here for an introduction to the founder's tribulations in 1972-75]

And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here

*Link from here to an explicit affidavit submitted in support of the challenges born of and attached to the abuse of the Housing Benefit funds through the Local Authorities, such as Haringey, Enfield, Hackney, etc.

*Link also from here to the evidence qualifying the fact that VICTIMS OF THE ORGANISED CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD INSTIGATED BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES (ongoing through abuse of the courts facilities, 'the staff and officers of which, endorse it all) FALL FOR THE REWARDS UNDER THE TABLE AND AGREE TO KEEP THE REWARDS from plundered taxpayers' contributions, UNDER THEIR HATS.

*Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised while Members of Parliament were -as they still are- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:- 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite; none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM. HE ACTUALLY SPOKE OF FALSE RECORDS / ABOUT A FORGERY advanced and promoted by the legal circles when the Commissioner was delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1976. He spoke of such activities, criminal acts by solicitors some 15 months after he received a true copy of THE FORGERY that was created and promoted by the licensed criminals for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes' to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, >a typical PSEUDOdemocracy<.

Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION OF THE SOLICITORS & THE BARRISTERS in 1972?

*Link from here to developments in 2010 >COMMITMENTS - UNDERTAKINGS - PROMISES< as recorded in an interview to 'COUNSEL' by Attorney General, Dominic Grieve.
With such facilities in place (the words we point to here) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts?
ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm [*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise
On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE, on record since 1940 and revealed deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other
IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'sucker-serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegedly protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION.
Needless to say the case we refer to above entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (thinkers) from animals]
Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *
family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS
[*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.
An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police [*L],
          one to solicitors [*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES (Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])
Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES >>as of October 2011 access an explicit FAX received by lovers / promoters operating out of false fronts<<]

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1972 which the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

Follow articles by 'Diogenis' at http://www.justiceraped.org and benefit from the realities suppressed for centuries.

misconduct.htm              KEY  Page Changes18 May 2005

hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes)JOIN the Community On Line and work with others for and in the necessary challenges and exposures for the common good. Link to Information Page

The visitor's attention is drawn to the words of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors / creators of The Gospel according to St. Luke. Access His words to the lawyers some 2000 years ago. Many the dignitaries over the two millennia who shared His views (*Link).

  

 

 

 
Misconduct in Public Office  *Page created April 1998*  
undercon.gif (286 bytes) Page Revised: October 13, 2011.  Introduction to page NOW points to Fundamental DUTIES of the Home Secretary as policing Supremo
Site under reconstruction - ongoing additions and improvements in material and links From and to other pages / web-sites

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

 

 

Court of Appeal ruling case
 The Common Law Offence of    'Misconduct in Public Office'

Visitors should access the sections of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 after reading the facts and rights covered in this page. Parts of the CJA1988 specifically cover the indictable offences that ARE REGARDED AS COMMITTED 'through an act or an omission'. Readers, researchers, victims on acquainting themselves with the brief elements of the cases stated below can use this [*Link] for direct connection to the specific provisions.

"The appellant...... was on duty...... took no steps to..... HE WAS CHARGED in an indictment with misconduct whilst acting as an officer of justice in that he deliberately failed to carry out his duty...... by wilfully omitting to take any steps to........ bring to justice....... At the trial he objected to the indictment on the grounds that it did not disclose an offence known to the law. The trial judge ruled against the objection and the trial proceeded. The jury returned a verdict of guilty and the appellant was convicted. He appealed against the conviction on the ground that the trial judge erred in ruling that the indictment disclosed an offence known to law. The appellant conceded that at common law there existed an offence of misconduct in public office, but contended that mere nonfeasance by a person in the discharge of his duty as the holder of a public office was insufficient to constitute the offence and there had to be a malfeasance or, at least, a misfeasance involving corruption or fraud."   

The Court of Appeal HELD:

"A public officer who wilfully and without reasonable excuse or justification neglected to perform any duty he was bound to perform by common law or statute was indictable for the common law offence of misconduct in public office. The element of culpability required was not restricted to corruption or dishonesty, although it had to be such that the conduct impugned was calculated to injure the public interest and called for punishment. Whether there was such conduct was a matter for the jury on the evidence. Since the indictment alleged deliberate and wilful neglect by the appellant to perform his duty...... it disclosed an offence of misconduct in public office. It followed that the judge's ruling had been correct and that the appeal would be dismissed".

The above scenario should be close to the hearts of many a victim of the legal circles, judicial chair occupants, the police also irresponsible Members of Parliament and Ministers. All should look to themselves however, as a first port of call and all should ask themselves: "What steps did I ever take in order to ensure that the citizens of these lands, the taxpayers, are made aware of the false states sold to the citizens by alleged servants of the public?" We need only point to the material in our pages where we cover the realities pointing to the fact that the citizens are systematically fed with misinformation by the Intellectual Prostitutes who are retained and maintained by the media barons simply to act so. We hasten to add also, that the media relentlessly promote all manner of irrelevant, to the well being of society, activities and issues; worse, however are the ever-present detractions to created and misrepresented pseudo-concerns and data that in no way represent realities and the truth of the matter DUE TO THE FACT that all elements of essence to the data ARE IGNORED & SUPPRESSED. [*Link from here to list of sold to the system as is defaulters who failed and fail, with intent, to act in any manner that could put on record, in the public domain their alleged complaints. They act so, simply because they were/are after the spoils created through the abused court facilities, the organised fraud and corruption we expose in the exclusive page linked-to from here]

The ruling we point to, below, is very clear. It makes more than just common sense, when one reads it in conjunction with the obvious, which the case stated above covers.

"Where deceit was practised by an intentional wrongdoer he was liable for the actual damage which directly flowed from the fraudulent inducement without reference to the transaction date or any other date, and foresee-ability of such damage was irrelevant".

In a nutshell the wrongdoer who indulges in deceit / dishonesty / crime meets the costs of the original and all accrued damages whether or not the wrongdoer could foresee that damages would flow from the original wrongdoing. Consider the Court of Appeal ruling above and bear in mind the following factors:

  1. The assertion and reliance, by an officer of law, that only if there had been evidence of any involvement or engagement in fraud or corrupt practices (for that matter) could there have been grounds leading to the indictment and the prosecution that secured a conviction under common law. Their Lordships, at the time, did not need to refer to any Act of Parliament to determine that an officer of law did act wrongly and in contempt of his duties to serve the law and the citizens.
  2. The ruling, above, makes it abundantly clear that, when a person indulges in any act leading to pecuniary advantage and thefts of properties (including rights in law, do note) as covered by Acts of Parliament to which we point in our pages [*Link from here to an element covered by law, no one relates to] the person is liable for the original damages and the accrued consequential losses and damages.
  3. In the first case the offender merely negated in his duties to protect a member of the public from the consequences of criminal acts. In the second case what we have is an offender who indulged in wrongdoing for pecuniary advantage - for which you must refer to the page you can link to from the above paragraph.
  4. Consider, now all of the above issues and the most relevant issue of all. Citizens, pardon, the 'serfs', are constantly bombarded with : "Ignorance of the law is no defence". The officer of the law in the first case, above, could not even have been considered as an ignorant of the law 'serf'. However, how about the criminals who indulged in the procurement and the promotion of a false instrument, which they also made even falser by forging the date after they discovered that they had goofed? [*Link to the page where we relate briefly the criminal activities by the legal circles INCLUDING JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPANTS ALL THE WAY TO THE COURT OF APPEAL].
  5. EVEN BETTER for the 'serfs' to consider. How could any judicial chair occupant or police officer, who handled the false and forged instrument, EVER rely on ignorance of the law, when in fact they get their fat salaries, from our taxes, just to apply their knowledge of the law to the facts stated by the victims of crime and covered also in the theatres which they dare to promote as alleged courts of justice?
  6. Look up the word 'jockey' in any decent etymological dictionary. No one can possibly fail to recognise the implications that arise out of the crass arrogance of police officers and judicial chair occupants. They indulge in the most vile of crimes, because of and through their contempt of the law which they are retained to serve, as public(!) servants(?).
  7. Can anyone not agree with us that what we are faced with are nothing but Rampant Corruption Jockeys? (*F1 a most important element below)

Over to you, your Lordship, and to your dedicated team who allegedly is looking into complaints about judicial conduct. The citizens, your Lordship, look to the Home Office and to the Home Secretary for protection (*Link) and for the police, under the command of the Home Office, to cease their vile activities, such as we point to in our pages.  We publish evidence that they rely on stooges and planted mischief makers who promote nothing but inexcusable and unjustified lies (*Link) created and promoted by the scam in the police forces in every corner of these islands, as in other parts of the world, that can be accessed in and through our pages.

WE, the pro-active citizens, do not rely on the stooges and the lap-dogs who serve their masters (*Link) from within the media. We are using our rights as provided under THE LAW. Your Lordship, neither you nor the persons that YOU MAINTAIN IN OFFICE, as servants of the law and justice, and as alleged judicious persons, can go on ignoring the victims of the rampant fraud, at and through the courts. We shall not be silenced.

We look to the elected, our representatives in government, to ensure that all bad apples are made to account, personally THROUGH YOUR OFFICE and the department that meets their fat salaries, for the wrongs they imposed on the 'serfs' whom they targeted and target in collaboration with the legal circles.

We look to the present government and its leader, also all others who are legally qualified, to ensure that the undertaking, in 1995, to deal with the FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM, is dealt with appropriately by the House of Commons, the elected representatives of the 'citizens'. The citizens object to being treated as 'serfs' of the Middle Ages. The days of 'you create and we take', supposedly, were laid by the wayside when democracy was introduced to these islands.

We look to their Lordships including the Law Lords to come to terms with the fact that true Democracy is from the roots up and not from the leaves down (*Link). The other way round implies and amounts to dictatorship by abusers of the power of office, any office. Public servants should be seen to be serving the citizens in accordance with the remit of their retainers and ALWAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW.

Our founder wonders, if by any chance the French jurist Charles Louis Montesquieu was referring to these islands and the arrangements by the predecessors of the managers / organisers / planners of the lives of 'the subjects' when he coined:
   "When I go to a country, I do not look to see whether there are good laws, but whether those there are enforced, for good laws are everywhere".

FOOTNOTES
Footnote eXtra: In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that the y, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"].
While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a)  the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides]. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link* [*L] from here to the letter] and note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob].
   1.   xxx
   2.  xxx

 

Link to:   C.A.P's INDEX      Fraud Vitiates Judgements ruling   The LAW Covers FALSE INSTRUMENTS that fail to account for any material fact  
Link to:    The Police   Police Complaints Page 1    Police Complaints Authority

...

Back to HomePage

New page released in October 2011 resting on a FAX many fraudsters-club-recruits received in 1999 >IMPORTANT WARNING / HINT <Access www.justiceraped.org & follow the articles by Diogenis searching for 'humans' >THINKERS< 2400 years on

APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides used to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers of abused public services in allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.
The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.
HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com system THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were ignored.
Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com
In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.
EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.
Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is
.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegedly reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s). 

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment&Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
NOTE: The human rights Community on Line facility is no longer available by NorthSky.Com because the owner of the domain >human-rights.org< took steps to put an end to the abuse of the trust the officers and the staff of NorthSky.Com engaged in, in breach of the corporation's agreement with Andrew Yiannides the owner of the domain and the person whose concept was put to all victims of the abused courts facilities as far back as 1997 when the need to produce video documentaries for submissions to the media was also acted upon, by the proponent, Andrew Yiannides. Andrew acted after the managers/controllers of the LIPS crowd/mob endorsed the proposition. However, the allegedly concerned 'organisers of the LIPS mob, failed to co-operate and act as their false tongues allegedly endorsed. ALL victims of abused public facilities, especially the courts services should access [*Link] the page where we publish evidence most relevant in the SUPPRESSION OF THE TRUTH & REALITIES from the taxpayers.
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster

Last modified: October 13, 2011