HELP US TO HELP YOU Please [*Link to plea].

JOIN
others on Line and publish your Statement of Facts, also the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law and ACT with other victims against the offenders. It is in the victims'  interest to work with one another for successes through the evidence all can share. Victims can benefit from the use of pooled data that establishes the common practices, as in the case of the member whose case  Mr Yiannides submitted to the European Court of Human Rights. In our pages we have published the STATED FACTS and the VIOLATIONS pleaded for you to access the details of in order to NOTE the VERY COMMON practices at and in our courts. [*Link to page]

Site reconstruction with ongoing editorial changes, new material and pages with links to from other pages / sites 

THE COURTS SERVICE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

HOW & WHAT FOR the courts and legal services are used in the United Kingdom >as in other PSEUDOdemocracies

*

WE propose to publish documents as posted by and received from Courts. It will be for the public and the world at large (as unbiased jurors) to determine and marvel at the capabilities and the PRACTICES that somehow repetitiously and systematically the public, in the United Kingdom, is subjected to. It is ALL done for and in the interests of the legal professions. (*See footnote) The citizens -treated as 'serfs' or subjects to the whims of the corrupt and the corrupted- have no rights to protection under any law. And thus the corrupters just march on unhindred as the corrupted join the corrupters for expansion & entrenchment of the New Wolrd Order.

*

The most common practice - Court ORDERS - arising out of non-events & not in accordance with rules of procedure. *Link from here [*L] to such practices, also to a challenge when a county court judge (D.J) was indulging in contempt of the law and the rules [*L] of procedure : contempt for 'due process' as provided / stipulated in international law : ECHR). In the first example / link *Orders POSTED LATE, also, in order to misdirect actions and cases into the biggest fraud ongoing, in our courts, that of appeal THROUGH LEAVE TO APPEAL, as the late postings created / 'opened that route'.

*

We point, in the concluding words above, to the created need for 'Leave to Appeal', ploy, 'you are late'.

*

The above route is the most abused for perverting justice, as court cases are treated, by the criminals who  plan and are in control of it all.

*

A common abuse of the rules of procedure leading to many a naive, and, illiterate in Court practice, citizens falling victim to the costs for 'leave to appeal' PLOYS from 'judicial' [Note: 'NOT judicious' : *Link* [*L] to definition] orders' that rest and are founded on abuse of office and court facilities, as the case you were / can link to from the second bulleted paragraph, above.

*

The rules applicable to the 'leave to appeal' rouse are in no way part of any act of Parliament. Just another 'facility' put in place by the abusers of the legal system / the court service. The 'convenient facility' simply justifies the conclusion that the intention was and has always been 'fraud' because of the element that is introduced, used and relied upon by the abusers of the courts' facilities.

*

Leave to appeal leads to : "NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MERITS OF THE CASE ITSELF'. Inexcusable and unjustified waffle, by the administrators of Justice and the courts service, consequential to constructively engineered fraud on Mr & Mrs Average. And, Members of Parliament, simply ignoring it all, as illiterates in law, not to mention elected members of parliament with a professional background 'in law'! [*Link from here to the words of a solicitor an extract from a letter to a client in March 2003].

*

PLEA: We need assistance, in order to secure access to the Old Master, the painting of the Biblical Scene that was used in the production of the TV programme we refer to, at the site you can link to from here.

THE COURT SERVICE staff, like automata, always respond to victims (who complain about the denial of fair treatment by the courts) with the usual 'Independence of the Judiciary', excuse [*Link from here to an interesting letter from an illiterate public servant] as if judges are also independent of the restrains of law in matters of honesty and deception. No provisions for any authority, not even the person (Minister) responsible FOR the judiciary, to oversee and investigate legitimate complaints arising out of the commonest of criminal activities that judicial chair occupants engage / partake in, and even instigate of their own. Simple and blatant violation of Article 13 of the European Convention of Human Rights, leading to, and often resting on other blatant violations of human rights because of and for the other ulterior motives of the Legal/Judicial/Police TRIAD that operate the free-for-all in the United Kingdom. All know of the fact that THERE EXISTS NO AUTHORITY TO SUPERVISE AND MONITOR the conduct of judicial chair occupants and IF JUDGES ACT within the reemit of their retainers, as public servants! Their undertakings under the Judicial Oath are very clear; yet in one bothers to check or follow up complaints on issues that clearly evince / suggest that THEIR PRESUMED KNOWLEDGE OF LAW IS APPLIED, at all, when dispensing with their public duties!

The lack of ADMINISTRATION (from above and from within the Justice Department / The Lord Chancellor and his office) simply created the free-for-all the legal circles thrive in and benefit from. Most certainly the situation has been so for decades, as Andrew, the founder of *human-rights*, recognised over 39 years ago. [*Link from here to the arrogant assurances from the judiciary to the politicians and to all other public servants TO  BE ABSOLVED OF ANY WRONGDOING one and all impose on the sucker-serfs who have taxes imposed on them for such 'amenities to the criminals in control of an allegedly civilised society, a PSEUDOdemocracy resting and founded on rampant fraud and the corruption of morons* [*L] such as we point to in our pages].

The situation may well have been so FOR CENTURIES because public servants, from within the Law Enforcement Agencies, default.to apply themselves to Parliament's Law [*F5]. References to the works of Charles Dickens, in our pages, ought not to be treated casually; he knew a thing or two, for in 'Bleak House' and 'The Pickwick Papers', for instance, he expressed clearly 'stated views / his observations'.

So did the creators of the New Testament also, for they put on record, in the Gospel according to St. Luke, one reads of 'the parctices of the Lawyers 2000 years ago, as practiced by the followers of the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works ever to have been misrepresented to mankind. In conjunction with the aforesaid 'warnings', the words attributed to Jesus Christ according to the Gospel of St. John (one of the John's in any case) to the religious leaders of the Hebrews of His days J.C reocorded to have retorted : "You Are Of Your Father The Devil" >>> Neeed one wonder WHY the assaults on Christianity / Christians, as in the case of the teacher we point to [*L] care of Andrew Yiannides' assistance to the victim-teacher who was ignored and abandoned by one and all? WE invite readers / visitors to consider our closing words in respect of the role of 'the media' in an allegedly civilised..... PSEUDOdemocracy where suppression of the truth / the realities and contempt for ALL law rule supreme as we cover and expose in our pages. 

The C.o.A ruling in "The Downing Street Years - case" [*Link] exposed the sham of it all. It was but a typical example of what our Judiciary excel at. The income generating conditions for the circles from within which our Judges rose/rise to public office IS ALWAYS their first priority.

IT IS FOR THE PRESENT LORD CHANCELLOR to adhere to the promise made by the Labour Party, when in opposition, and to keep a register of bad judges: 'we refer to the issue of false instruments that lack accountability by the authors, the judges. It is and IT will be the responsibility of the present Government to ensure that legislation is introduced to ensure that TRUE UNBIASED AND UNTAINTED COURT PROCEEDINGS (in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights) ARE FULLY RECORDED. It costs less than TWO POUND STERLING to use a 4 hour video tape at extended play speed (8 hours) to secure TRUE RECORDS of what goes on inside the theatres of our Judicial halls.

*

*

*

*

*

*

WHY generate, with intent, unnecessary volumes of paperwork (third parties benefiting for transcripts 'to be approved by the directors of all fraud and corruption at and through the courts) IN THIS DAY AND AGE of ELECTRONIC wonders?  WHY NOT TRUE uncut and UNEDITED VIDEO RECORDINGS for ALL Court hearings and proceedings in our Courts ???  [*Link from here to a House of Lords Precedent case, dating back to 1939-40 and consider the elements their Lordships applied themselves to and deliberated upon].

RECORDINGS ON DEMAND your Lordship. (*F3 a most important Footnote)  

THIS IS THE AGE OF FREEDOM OF INFORMATION AND EXCHANGE
*Link from here to a video clip when Sen. Jay Rokefeller spoke of the Internet not being part of the plans.... 

    YOUR VIEWS on the subject matter are welcome.  How about a petition for legislation to VIDEO record all Court Proceedings with automatic right to copies for the parties as with the police audio recordings that Parliament provided for, under The Police And Criminal Evidence Act 1984?
    WHY DISCRIMINATE against the police?
    
.

*Link from here to Sir Robert Mark's, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner's >Dimbleby Lecture in 1973< as prepared and delivered by him on BBCV-TV
Refer to *Link from here to the front page headlines of the Daily Mail on 30th July 1998 and to Paul Johnson's essay in November 1998*
*Link from here also to an explicit article in the London Evening Standard, in September 1999*

*

WE DID SAY *meant to be investigating*, back in 1998 when we added the above 'more dust in your eyes, long suffering public'. The obliging media barons always ready, willing and able to promote the vile schemes of the controllers of CIUKU Enterprises, as with the present 'stirring up' of racial disharmony because of the refugees and asylum seekers, the states created by the fraudsters who follow the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works ever to have been misrepresented -with fraudulent intentions- to mankind, by its creators, their successors and by the many who sought power as Magalomaniacs and impostors, over the centuries / millennia since the concocted rubbish by seasoned criminals was delivered to Ptolemy of Egypt under specific cicumstances humans have been deprived knowledge of 'the truth', care of the plans of the criminals who created and the leaders of the followers of the concocted vile creation, the Old Testament*

*Link from here to an extract, the most clear of hints from the vile work, for thinkers to consider

*

*

*

Convenient that through defaults and omissions the media barons always produce half baked potatoes.
FACT: On 13 December, 2002, the Crime Editor of 'The Sun' reported his views*  Odd that he discovered pantomimes in the courts BY AND FOR THE CRIMINALS who are in control of YOUR RIGHTS IN LAW Mr & Mrs Average Sheeple.

*Link from here to the page we created around the editor's promotions

*

*

No need for the public to know of the realities and the DESTRUCTION OF FAMILIES AT WILL as we cover in our pages, by the manipulative* and the criminals**  ( [*L] who are in control in an alleged Democracy; an allegedly civilised society resting and founded, allegedly on principles of Law & Order. [*Link [**L] to another page / case history example].

*Link from here to the page where we cover aspects of the solicitors activities in organised fraud as in the case of the FORGERY we point to in this page

*

The condescending accessories and promoters of CIUKU Enterprise, from within the media, always ready  to serve any half baked potatoes to the citizens they are meant to be informing with THE FACTS, in an allegedly civilised democracy. Acting as the puppets who dangle on the strings of the puppeteers, serving the the false states promoting the imposed pseudo-democracies is but their main pre-occupation, however.

*

ACCESS the events we reported to the government in March 2002* [*L]. Ensure that you DO READ the facts covered in the page we link you to. Bear in mind that the actress who had been engaging in the scenarios we covered, was married to a police officer and that she was an accessory to constructive frauds through the usual scams and theatrical productions in the courts*. [Access [*L] in another page and read parts of the affidavit which the lousy actress never reported to the authorities or challenged at court. Thereby she betrayed her parts and overriding role in the blunt & arrogant constructive frauds on the taxpayers : Mr & Mrs Average]. Note the facts reported / stated in both pages and then consider what was reported in 'The Sun' on 7th March 2002* [*L], the day after the actress received a very clear fax* [*L], about her parts in the blunt & arrogant constructive frauds at and through the courts created / enacted.

*

Who but the senior officer retained, instructed and meant to be investigating the 'untouchables' came up with the utterances which 'The Sun' was praising him for?

*

The senior officer DID NOT come up with anything leading to prosecutions of any of the criminals who are in control of the courts and the court services. Yet he was presented as a courageous and brave hero, by 'The Sun'!

*

He accepted a knighthood and took over from the departing Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Paul Condon,  who received plenty of communications about the FORGERIES that were used to misappropriate and steal HOUSING BENEFIT funds belonging to others, as organised by the staff and officers at Haringey Council and Enfield Council in North London, also at Hackney Council in East London. All and everything with the blessings of the Metropolitan Police, all the way to the Office of the Commissioner and blunt participation in the scams by the staff and officers within the Local Authorities the Local County Courts. [*Link from here to the page where we released the Appeal that caused the government to announce the Bill of Rights while the many charlatans and stooges who contacted us (allegedly because they wished to challenge and expose the rampant fraud ongoing in and imposed through abuse of the courts facilities) shoved their heads in the sand or congregate in the caves where they hatched and hatch up their plans HOW TO OBSTRUCT & CONSPIRE(D) TO DISCREDIT ANY GENUINE CHALLENGERS and how best to secure ongoing fraudulent gains from the processes they fell in love with, and signed up to, as fraudsters-club-recruits / maintenance engineers of the system of operations].

*

THEFTS and CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ORGANISED  BY THE STAFF & OFFICERS OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITY that was meeting and meets the salaries of police officers who do not serve the victims of crime but through defaults and omissions they ensure the criminals flourish and multiply. [*Link].

*

NOTE OUR FAIR COMMENTS and read the evidence that we point you to. DO NOT FAIL to access the above link/page and IF you really wish to know of the facts of life, as organised for the citizens by the controllers of CIUKU Enterprises, access the site where the mother of the young lady (to whom we dedicated this web-site) publishes which parties and who responsible for what in that tragic scenario. DO NOT FAIL TO NOTE THAT THE CRIMINAL WAS SERVED by the criminals in control of the police, the Coroners' office and the Magistrates Courts staff and officers. [*Link]

*

WE PUBLISH in our pages information on developments which THE CITIZENS / VICTIMS can use when challenging the offenders who breach the law and violate the citizens rights through abuse of office and blunt misconduct in / at Court. More often than not the citizens are unaided because 'the organisers of the system' SO ARRANGE and HAVE CREATED FOR THEIR victims [*Link to list, of some].

*

A typical case / scenario can be accessed in our pages [*Link directly to page]. The victims of banking fraud, Harry & Carole Roffey are preparing their own pages and web-site; just another example of the rampant fraud and corruption which, if not instigated at and by the courts, nonetheless approved and endorsed by ALL PUBLIC SERVANTS. Public Servants, who are in fact retained to serve the citizens and to protect them from crime  and criminals, in fact ENDORSE AND PROMOTE THE ACTIVITIES AS PERFECTLY NORMAL. The VICTIMS / CITIZENS WERE SUBJECTED TO BLUNT CRIMINAL ACTS, and within the public servants' own code of morals and their knowledge of 'the law' such activities were/are normal and acceptable. [*Link to an exclusive page where we challenge the content of a judgement (transcript) by way of a SKELETON ARGUMENT as settled by Mr. Andrew Yiannides the founder of human-rights (NGO) for and on behalf of victims of FRAUDULENT IMPOSITIONS BY BANK STAFF & OFFICERS].

*

Among the promoters, persons who operate from within the COURTS IN JUDICIAL CAPACITIES. Persons from within the Law Enforcement Agencies acting in contempt of the evidence and the law and recklessly breach their public duties.

*

Read the skeleton argument, attached to an appeal. Victims who do read it, should recognise 'the usual scenarios and scripts from the legal circles' and above all, the defaults by judicial chair occupants who abuse and misconduct in public office.

*

Of such material and 'facts of life within an allegedly civilised society / state, that allegedly   which we settled and published covering precisely the arrangements by the criminals who are in control of the citizens' rights in law.  The CAP's  (Citizens Alternative Precedents, proposed by our founder in 1981 through The CAMILA Project,* are well intended. ALL VICTIMS Of the TRIAD, SHOULD and MUST participate in a true DEMOCRATIC SPIRIT). The state, through Parliament should also recognise the need for changes. IT MUST DO its best to assist us in our efforts to bring about TRUE, UNHINDERED, UNADULTERATED, UNBIASED and UNBLEMISHED JUSTICE in the United Kingdom. The MEDIA should cease shoving the facts and the attached evidence in the family closet and stop promoting the plans hatched up in secret sessions with the self appointed dictators, whose greed and pseudo-interest in mankind the editors and their subordinates turn a blind eye to, just as they stay as blind, as deaf and as dumb as the persons who were responsible for the issues that caused the Daily Mirror to come up with such views on 22 May 1992.

THE MOTTO for all from within should be:-
"Preach not to others and PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH"
[*Link from here to an explicit quote by the great French Jurist Charles Louis Montesquieu].

The Law and rules of court, in any CIVILISED SOCIETY / STATE provide FOR THE PROTECTION OF society as a whole, just as for the individual citizen  [*Link from here to rights assured. *Link from here to principles of law in true Democratic States].
No one should benefit at the expense of any other 'without due process of AND STRICT ADHERENCE TO THE LAW, administered by (presumed and or assumed) experts / honourable individuals. [*Link from here to an appeal when Pleading the 'assured rights for due process' & when 'appropriate' challenges to the staff in the Lord Chancellor's office caused the abusers of the courts facilities to review, of their own, that which they had indulged in, in contempt of the law and rules of court. Visitors are urged to read the whole of the appeal document, in order to familiarise themselves with the extent of the abuse of public office and the reckless denials or rights BY judicial chair occupants in that instance].

In the HomePage the founder's conclusions, in 1975, consequential to 6 years of frustration because of the rampant free for all in the legal system, as operated by the legal circles. From solicitors, through the barristers 'via the independent, of the law, judicial chair occupants and 'the police part and parcel of the Organised Crimes Against 'the serfs'. [*Link from here to the founder's conclusions in the Home Page & *Link also from here to the evidence in the left panel / window].

Developments & activities by and from within the legal circles, the courts and the police maintained by the state, led to the conclusions : 'The rule of law non-existent' as Charles Louis Montesquieu determined centuries ago.

The rules of the Supreme Court were acquired by the founder of Human-Rights after the solicitor who was acting for the defrauded client (in a business contract) produced a forgery and told his client to abandon the case against the criminals the solicitor issued the necessary proceedings with counsel settling the particulars of claim, in accordance with the rules (the established practices & fraudulent ways of the legal circles) and the evidence at hand [*Link from here to explicit rules of court provisions].

"CIUKU Enterprises" was born as a result of the realisation of how, why and what for, one of the best, if not the best, legal system in the world is used by the criminals in control of the citizens' rights and lives in a pseudo-democracy where the media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain simply SUPPRESS THE TRUTH OF ANY MATTER their masters or the secret orders / brotherhoods they join so instruct them to do. [*Link from here to an element from material that was first published in 1902 in Russia and has long since been argued to have been a false instrument by the alleged circles to which the creation of such evil ploys was attributed by the promoter.

The practices led Mr. Andrew Yiannides to coin:- "The self-perpetuating cancerous growth industry"©. One only has to consider the routine directions offered to the citizens, pardon 'serfs', by their representatives in government: "See a solicitor". Such advise from within an alleged Christian state and nation where the sovereign happens, also, to be 'the protector of the faith'! [*Link from here to the words of Oliver Cromwell, George Washington & Thomas Jefferson].

Advise from the Blind, Deaf & Dumb who choose to ignore, that which their constituents take / refer to them. For almost 2000 years the words of The Great Teacher ignored and the reasons behind it all, the very issues that Oliver Cromwell accused 'the deputies of the people' of: - 'greed and corruption'.

>PRECISELY what the legal circles, the police serve and promote trhough their actions and convenient defasults at all material times relying on abusers of judicial chair occupation to endorse the criminal activities AS HAPPENED when the two LJs Orr and Buckley entertained the criminals activities of the solicitors and the barristers acting for both teams in the case Yiannides -v- Radley Gowns Ltd.

An illiterate from within the Lord Chancellor's Department, in 1995,
exposed institutionalised attitudes towards 'the serfs', the taxpayers.

• The letter, on the right, establishes the simple fact that judicial chair occupants indulge in contempt of the law they were / are retained to serve and uphold
• The author of the letter, as a trained promoter of the usual waffle, simply acted as all Public Servants(?) are instructed in & used for... 'to promote the freedom of judicial chair occupants to act in contempt of all law and thus protect the criminals in control'.
• Apparently THE MINISTER for Justice IS NOT, IN ANY WAY the SUPREMO & HEAD of the Justice System, the courts and the persons who are retained and appointed by his office to serve Justice, the Law and the citizens, in general.
• Evidently accountability for wrong doing is not part of 'the arrangements in place for the management of CIUKU Enterprises. [*Link to a brief legal argument that rests on relevant law. It applies in most if not all cases when judicial chair occupants act as the transcript and the FORGERY CREATED & USED in the case we point to above evinces]. 

Below page from a transcript, exposes arrogance & contempt for the law.

• The page, from a transcript, pertaining to a Court of Appeal hearing. TWO Lord Justices Orr & Buckley) entertaining an invitation to deny 'justice to a victim of FRAUD. (*F2)
• Relying on waffle aplenty and the use of a Forgery (image below) in order to introduce FALSE INSTRUMENTS [*Link from here to clarification in law] THROUGH ABUSE OF JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPATION, and contempt for the law, FOR THEIR PART and arrogant complicity in perversion and blunt corruption of Justice.
• Blunt contempt of the Law, as the legal circles organised for the occasion and as their training and established practices 'do evince' in myriad of cases up and down the country. [*Link to the images of the 1913 Forgery Act - click on image / page 4 & read the section relevant to courts]
• The evil in control aiding, abetting and protecting one another as they climb the ladder of the CIUKU Enterprises, ranks of managerial 'echelons' of the protection racket, as maintained and promulgated by seasoned criminals.
• All in the interest of  wealth creation through crime founded and resting on abuse of public office. READ the waffle from their Lordships as they chose to serve criminals and crime, care of the much revered Independence of the judiciary from the restraints of Parliament's Law. [*Link from here to the foundations for truly Democratic states and the rights assured to their citizens under national law & international treaties and accords]
• Everyone who looked and looks at the document, below, can spot the altered date. But their Lordships ignored it all, including a contemporaneous letter where the original fraudster wrote to categorically state that such a document, as the one their Lordships  were looking at, did not exist, hence the issue of 'contemporaneous evidence' = AT THE TIME OF THE EVENTS, when the fraud was indulged into by the defendants.
• Offering invisible services to CRIMINALS was & is the name of their game. As in other cases, the activities within the legal circles and the courts are systematically ignored by the police and Ministers.
• Needless to say the Law Society & The Bar Council, as indifferent and unconcerned as the abusers of public office. All relying on judicial chair occupants to absolve them of all indiscretions and foul of the law activities. (*F4)

Page from the transcript

Experts at & servants of the law acting in contempt of it, AS INVITED by the fraud of a barrister who submitted to court a concocted Defence in support of an open and shut case of Commercial FRAUD. The same fraudster also invited the court, through an affidavit he endorsed, to act in breach of their public duties, and in contempt of the law. Of such activities breaches of the Judicial Oath.

THE document below WAS the FORGERY referred to in the transcript above.

The document did not exist at the time of the events that gave rise to the institution of the High Court proceedings. THREE YEARS LATER it was procured /  created by the criminals who relied on the criminals in the Law Enforcement Agencies, the courts and the police to misconduct in public office.  PERVERTING JUSTICE is the game of such hardened criminals who benefit from practice certificates by the 'godfathers of all crime'. The promoter of the forgery / false instrument was deemed to be QC material and later he was rewarded OR benefited from an appointment to a judicial chair occupancy within the commercial division at, the RCJ,   naturally [*Link to our definition for RCJ and consider the above realities]. One only has to look at the date to NOTE THAT IT HAD A LITTLE COSMETIC SURGERY for improvement. Yet the experts at law who receive their fat salaries to deal with crime and criminals just ignored the provisions of the THEFT ACTS. Visitor if you have not read the introduction to this page, DO SO NOW.

Their Lordships, were holding the forgery above in their hands with their eyes (physical and mental) closed, apparently. Marvel at how blind the judiciary can choose to be when they serve crime & criminals and NOT the law as successive governments promote and assert with arrogant tongue in cheek mentality in the U.K. 

The copy of the letter below covers the jest of the commercial transaction

• READ how the criminal / fraudster was cornered and trapped before proceedings were instituted.
• The only way the fraudster could get out of the situation was to retain criminals who were well connected* [*Link] in order to benefit from the invisible services that are on offer at and through the courts by the managers of Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited Enterprises.

The confirmation, below, is dated 5th February 1970.

Dear Sir
   Further to your letter of 3rd February please be advised that style 3830/40/42/2397 was cancelled by our committee and agreed upon by Radley Gowns on October 10th.

Yours Faithfully

Miss Anne
YOUNGER STYLES

The above letter qualifies also that C&A Modes operated through a protected system of commercial activities. Note the references to the fact that a committee and not a single person was responsible for purchase and order placing / processing, thus removing the element of corrupt(ed) agents abusing office and position.

• COULD ANYTHING HAVE BEEN CLEARER?
• Especially when checked against all other contemporaneous and documented evidence?
• JUDGES OFFERING INVISIBLE SERVICES TO CRIMINALS for the creation of the society of their choice WAS / IS IN THE ORDER OF THE DAY. [*Link from here to a page where we apply our knowledge of historical realities, stated and covered in published material which NO ONE CAN IGNORE or carry on misrepresenting as the criminals who HAVE BEEN & ARE IN CONTROL have engaged in for far too long].
• And the exclusive page we point to from here covers HOW THE SYSTEM HAS been operating through persons who, through abuse of public office, condition Mr. & Mrs. Average, 'the serfs', to endorse the rampant fraud through the abused courts' facilities, as covered in the page. [*Link from here to the page covering the facts of life in our allegedly civilised pseudo-democracy]. 
• GREED and personal gain at the top of their agenda. [*Link to a page where one such person wrote of the parts such fraudsters engage in as alleged legal gurus, who operate in the courts in much the same manner as the solicitors].
• The very elements the motivating forces for the multitude of stooges, charlatans and fraudsters club recruits who were sent along, as initiates, to play at and with craft-y elements they benefit from as the tutored, guided & USED bricks-n-mortar for the building (note the words) of societies that are organised and managed by the followers of the Great Architect, the alleged creator of all and everything.

• "A judge and a solicitor have been arrested by detectives investigating allegations of corruption in a number of courts".
• The Department of Constitutional Affairs is called upon to authorise one of its Senior Officers to inform us and the press IF the Department is to carry on promoting the usual rubbish about judicial chair occupants not being 'subject to the restraints of law'. [*The challenge to the authorities, with our compliments to the managers and organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob, the fraudsters club recruits who contacted Andrew soon after the explicit Appeal was lodged at Bow County Court in May 1992. Also to their like-minded affiliates and associates who operate out of similarly organised groups as alleged challengers of the ARROGANT FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS IMPOSED ON THE TAXPAYERS, when nothing could be further from the truth]

Anyone around, police or Member of Parliament, still ready to promote the usual rubbish about judicial chair occupants 'not subject to the restraints of law' when indulging in criminal activities in the purported execution of their public duties? [*Link from here to the page where we point to and cover the overriding and undeclared rules of practice used by criminals who misrepresent themselves as alleged officers / administrators of the law in allegedly civilised Democratic States]

The Rules of the Supreme Court we refer to, provided:

Under 18/8/4: "It is the duty of counsel, not to enter a plea of fraud on the record ".... unless he has clear and sufficient evidence to support it". (see per Lord Denning in 'Associated Leisure Ltd. -v- Associated Newspapers Ltd. [1970] 2 Q.B. 450 at p. 456]. Any charge of fraud or misrepresentation must be pleaded with the utmost particularity. "In the Common Law Courts no rule was more clearly settled than that fraud must be distinctly alleged and as distinctly proved, and that it was not allowable to  leave fraud to be inferred from the facts". 

Solicitors in the first instance received full particulars and they proceeded to state the facts and delivered the submitted documented evidence to counsel. Counsel then settled and pleaded the specific fraud, in a commercial / business contract, as stipulated under the rules, in other words 'the evidence existed to support the claim for fraud. WHEN the two of them subsequently entertained and promoted the blunt forgery, as allegedly legitimate evidence, in support of a concocted Defence that never was (in the mode used by Lord Jeffrey Archer of recent years) fraud ceases to be a pleading but a realisation that the practitioners themselves are the biggest fraudsters going in our allegedly civilised society, a society that allegedly is founded and rests on law and order. In the instance we refer to here THERE WAS NO LAW but contempt of it by the very individuals the victim of fraud retained for recovery of his 'rights as assured and secured by law'.

The provisions are clear, yet, how many victims of the legal circles, the operatives of the 'Self Perpetuating Cancerous Growth Industry' ©, have ever been assisted by the criminals in control to challenge the activities of the very circles? One only has to refer to the case of the member of the *human-rights.org * Community On Line* and the pleadings, STATED FACTS as submitted to the European Court of Human Rights, covering the violations imposed on the victim by the very circles, within our country [*Link]. When a judge, to all intents and purposes cannot grasp the difference between "IMPOSED ON THE CLIENT - by the solicitors representing the client" & endorses a submitted order by the offending solicitors' barrister whereby "there was NO INFLUENCE on the client, and the judge did indulge so, either as an illiterate in plain English or as a split personality acting in two diametrically opposed roles while sitting in a judicial chair what we do have is RAMPANT CORRUPTION through institutionalised & organised FRAUD on the citizens. The facilities (ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE CITIZENS)  are as clear as can be when one consider the words used under the very same Order and rules of the Supreme Court [*Link] whereby the outcome was predetermined by the criminals in control and the actors who sell an allegedly civilised democracy that allegedly rests and is founded on the rule of law - THE TYPE OF RULE & LAW we point you to through the above link. 

18/9

Readers & researchers are urged to consider the provision qualifying RIGHTS TO PLEAD MATTERS ARISING AFTER THE ISSUE OF THE WRIT. We will release evidence to the effect that one and all from within the legal circles and the courts simply act in contempt of the provision.

Under 18/12/11  "Fraud - Para.(1) (b), supra, has reversed the former O.19 r.22, and it is now provided that the necessary particulars of fraudulent intention must be contained in the pleading. The pleader should accordingly set out the facts, matters and circumstances relied upon to show that the party charged had or was actuated by a fraudulent intention. Fraudulent conduct must be distinctly alleged and as distinctly proved, and it is not allowable to leave fraud to be inferred from the facts (Davy -v- Garrett, 7 Ch. D. p. 489; Behn -v- Bloom (1911), 132 L.T.J.87; Claudius Ash, Sons & Co,. Ltd. -v- Invicta Manufacturing Co., Ltd.. (1912), 29 R. P. C. 465, H.L). "General allegations, however strong may be the words in which they are stated, are insufficient to amount to an averment of fraud of which any Court ought to take notice" (Wallingford -v- Mutual Society, 5 App. Cas. p. 697; see especially the remarks of Lord Hatherley and Blackburn, pp. 701, 704.. The acts alleged to be fraudulent must be set out, and then it must be stated that these acts were done fraudulently, otherwise no evidence in support of them will be received (Re Rica Gold Washing Co., 11 Ch. D. 36; Redgrave -v- Hurd 20 Ch. D. 1; Smith -v- Chadwick, 9 App. Cas. 187:; Riding -v- Hawkins, 14 P. D. 56;; Lawrance -v- Noreys, 15 App. Cas. p, 221; But  from these acts fraudulent intent may be inferred (Johnson - Barnes [1883] W. N. 32; Herring -v- Bischoffscheim; [1876] W. N.. 77). Evidence of similar frauds was admitted where the statement of claim alleged that the fraud was part of a system (Edinburgh Life Assurance Co. -v- Y., [1911] 1lr. R. 306). Where the Plaintiff alleged that the entries made by defendant in certain books were false, he was ordered to identify the false entries and to state in what respect these entries were false and the nature of the falsehood or fraud alleged in respect of each item. (Newport etc., Co. -v- Paynter, 34 Ch. Div. 88, C. A. Harbord -v- Monk, 38 L. T. 411). But the fraud alleged in the pleading, and the fraud disclosed in the particulars, must be the fraud of the other party to the action, and not of a third person (Staffordshire Financial Co. -v- Hill (1909), 53 S. J. 446. H. L.) And see (n) "Concealed Fraud".......

• ON OFFER THROUGH The LEGAL CIRCLES,
• The POLICE AUTHORITIES,
• The COURTS SERVICE &
• The JUDICIARY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM - blunt & arrogant invisible services.

All and everything in contempt of all Law, as the founder, Mr. Andrew Yiannides was subjected to by all alleged servants of the Law & the Public, in an allegedly civilised Democracy wherein the rule of Law rules Supreme, allegedly! 

We publish above evidence that Court of Appeal Lord Justices consciously and with intent engaged in the perversion of justice and denial of rights to a targeted citizen. As we state in other pages, the activities the legal circles engaged in, over a period of five years were the eye opener for Mr Andrew Yiannides, the creator of these pages and founder of human-rights.org. The fact that the courts, all the way to the Court of Appeal, ENDORSED AS THEY STILL DO, criminal activities by the legal circles, and the judiciary freely indulge in rampant perversion of justice, caused Mr. A Yiannides to reconsider his belief in the promotions he had been subjected to by his School Masters at the English School in Nicosia, Cyprus.[*Link to 'background' to human-rights]. The 'RSC bible' - 1973 edition (from which images in this page) was bought after a solicitor and barrister advanced and promoted a FORGERY that was procured by the adversaries of the solicitor's client, nearly three years after the causes of action arose. The solicitor eagerly promoted the forgery, to his client, as a valid document that allegedly 'supported a defence the other side settled and served in a case of fraudulent misrepresentations two years after the close of pleadings.The aforesaid INSTRUMENT WAS FALSE because the defendants who were to rely on it qualified in letters that such a document as they procured/created and were promoting three years on DID NOT EXIST in the first instance. Evidently, solicitor and barrister never heard of 'contemporaneous evidence' just as the criminals in charge of investigating crime, the police. All would have the serfs / taxpayers in the United Kingdom that none of them knew of the provisions on forgeries and false instruments intended to be used for the sole purpose of perverting justice. Nearly thirty years on, Lord Jeffrey Archer, for indulging in a similar and not so obvious / blunt and exercise, was sent to prison!

In fact the document and blunt FALSE INSTRUMENT that was introduced years after the events, was even FORGED after it was created. The criminals changed the date that was endorsed on the false instrument after realising that the creator, of the false instrument, erred and wrote the wrong year when creating it. The wrong year and subsequent amendment are as clear as can be; only a moron or a criminal who was/is party to such activities turns a blind eye to the obvious and ONLY AN OFFICER OF THE COURT WHO IS OFFERING INVISIBLE SERVICES TO CRIMINALS ELECTS TO IGNORE SUCH  EVIDENCE AND THE LAW APPLICABLE IN SUCH MATTERS. The solicitors and their clients who had indulged in fraudulent misrepresentations, in the first instance, were relying on others, as from the service of the Writ of Summons and thereafter   the time when the FALSE & FORGED INSTRUMENT WAS INTRODUCED to promote and bring to fruition their new fraudulent intentions.
     NOTE: In fact they carried on relying on other criminals, the legal team of the targeted victim, to PROMOTE THE FORGERY AS A DOCUMENT ACCEPTABLE IN EVIDENCE FOR AND IN THE CASE. And both legal teams thereafter were relying on abusers of public office, from court staff to JUDGES, TO MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE in order to pervert and corrupt justice. Contempt of and for Parliament's Law, in the order of the day, as one recognises and gets to know of, through contact with the Law Enforcement Agencies and the legal circles, in our country.

From the solicitors, allegedly acting for the victim of fraud, through to the police and the judiciary, all playing their parts in constructive frauds at and through the courts. There followed arrogant impositions of obstruction and perversion of justice. In the above stated case the solicitors, failed to influence their client to abandon the claim / claims against the offenders. The legal circles thereafter indulged at the targeted client's expense while the police were ignoring the forgery, copy of which was handed to them. The police themselves were party to additional criminal activities while the legal circles engaged in compound frauds at and in the courts, such as the creation and promotion of false instruments such as allegedly legitimate Court Orders created by / issued by fraudsters who failed to address the issue of the forgery. WHEN Judicial chair occupants lend themselves to blunt corruption and perversion of Justice, in contempt of all law and evidence, with THE BLESSINGS OF THE POLICE, while a case was progressed all the way to the Court of Appeal. What the citizen was faced with was blunt and arrogantly ORGANISED - INSTITUTIONALISED FRAUD & CORRUPTION THROUGH THE COURTS.
[*Link from here to a case when the solicitors IMPOSED on their client an agreed settlement. The client who had been intimidated and blackmailed to 'accept' the imposed settlement (as agreed between the legal teams), subsequently challenged it all on being told of the rights breached. The client, in that case, also uncovered secret, undisclosed and suppressed issues that amounted to another typical scenario as enacted by the legal circles with the blessings of judicial chair occupants. TYPICAL OF THE CRIMINALS occupying judicial chairs, the victim of all was denied justice and the participation of all public servants all the way to the European Court of Human Rights, offers additional evidence in support of the declaration at the top of our pages].

FOOTNOTE:-
Footnote eXtra: In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, IF the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY, WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD. IF IT WILL DEAL APPROPRIATELY with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a)  the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides]. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link* [*L] from here to the letter] and note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we point to, relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob].
    1.   We always point(ed) persons who contact(ed) us, either as directed by others or of their own, to the fact that the founder of the human-rights.org Mr Andrew Yiannides never endorsed the blunt constructive frauds through the abused courts' facilities'. We cover, in our exclusive page*, the arrogant arrangements in place for rampant fraud on the taxpayers, and visitors who have not accessed the material, should do so without fail [*Link from here to solid evidence]. Mr Andrew Yiannides, the creator of this web-site and founder of the *human-rights* (organisation on line) turned down a number of offers and invitations to join the world of the corrupters and the corrupted simply because the practices within the courts (as organised by the legal circles and taken to fruition by abusers of judicial chair occupation) amount to gross abuse of the courts facilities for conversion of assets targeted, including use of TAX REVENUE FOR THE 'REWARDS to victims of the practices who convert to silent supporters, maintenance engineers & front line users of the practices, as covered and exposed in the exclusive page which victims(!) and the media barons have shoved in the dark corners of their 'blank minds' and their mentality towards the taxpayers who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of such facilities in an allegedly civilised pseudodemocracy; a state where SUPPRESSION OF THE TRUTH & PROMOTION OF FALSE STATES ARE THE FOUNDATION & THE CORNER STONE UPON WHICH ALL IS FOUNDED & RESTS. [*Link1 - *Link2 - *Link3 - *Link4] 
    2.   More often than not the placing of appeals for hearing before TWO ONLY court of Appeal LJ's is used as a smokescreen for undisclosed end-products in such scenarios. On occasions when appellants were informed of / challenged with the implications they were reported to Mr Andrew Yiannides to have 'benefited from the granting of a hearing before a full panel, THREE Lord Justices. On the 'alleged occasions' Mr Yiannides was NOT invited to the 'hearings promoted, conveniently, by third parties and not the alleged challengers!!! One of the instances when such promotions were spoken of, the 'appellant and his affiliates / associates miraculously failed to invite Mr Yiannides to 'the promoted venue' - theatrical productions in closed circuit, and targeted sucker-victims invited to such venues, in order to impress them with the facilities intended to lead to the rewards under the table, to conversion of the targeted to *fraudsters club recruits*. We point and link from here to the scenarios attached to the promotions through the press / media in respect of the saga created for and in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven DIVORCE CASE. We inform visitors / readers that such promotions came our way after we pointed the fact that the scenario / presentations in February 2000, before two Lord Justices ONLY (besides other elements) AMOUNTED TO MORE THAN A QUESTIONABLE VENUE', simply because RULINGS FROM SUCH VENUES DO NOT CONSTITUTE precedent cases that can, reliably, be used in/for other 'presentations, submissions & arguments at court'.
    3.     *Access from here the page where we publish a letter from an abuser of the trust he was permitted to benefit from while he was being assisted; get to know of the fcat that he was under investigation all the while, peruse diligently the links we use to point to his wilful and foul of the law activities, observed and noted by the person who guided him how to secure recordings of proceedings in order to benefit from unadulterated and factual 'records' of hearings at court. NOTE the elements that arose at the time prior to and at the time when Mr Norman Scarth wrote the letter that merited ALL OF THE OBSERVATIONS & SUBMISSIONS / CHALLENGES we realte in our pages. Andrew Yiannides had no option but to address and deal with the unacceptable misrepresentations many indulge in, in view of Mr Scarth's and his associates (from within the LIPS crowd/mob) who were noted to be operating as maintenance engineers, as promoters and as users of / beneficiaries from the spoils of the criminal activities instigated, promulgated, processed and executed through abuse of the courts facilities we cover in the exclusive web-page not one of the corrupted fraudsters ever addressed. Mr Scarth, his associates -from within the LPS crowd/mob- and their affiliates were fully aware of the fcat that Andrew was very familiar with the criminal activities and conversant with their parts as maintenance engineers of thje system of operations in the courts. Access also from here the page where we published the two pages from a transcript Mr Norman Scarth created (as he had been guided to secure from judicial chair occupants). Read the content of the 2 pages, recognise the elements of interest and WHY we published only the 2 pages and not the rest of the hearing before a full bench of the Court of Appeal at the RCJ, London. NOTE, however that for years the only elements we published were the two images with an introduction as to who secured the permission to record the hearing and who created the transcript while we were expecting of Mr Scarth (as a person who had agreed to act as webmaster for the Community on Line for the County of Yorkshire and the city of Leeds. As a committed to the system as is & as a convert to the abuse of the courts facilities for rampant fraud on the taxpayers (pointed to in the exclusive page) he failed to ever refer to issues raised or address the content of the exclusive page, covering as it did and does the criminal activities he and his associates with their affiliates had fallen in love with and converted to maintenance engineers of the rampant fraud on the taxpayers.
    4.   *Access from here a page where we publish material facts and realities born of a case when THEFT of Housing Benefit funds owing to owners of private properties was the name of the INSTITUTIONALISED FRAUD & CORRUPTION of new Letting Agency staff. Many the cases and many the properties occupied by the organised influx of refugees and asylum seekers, rushing to the land of milk and honey. The rush creating the need for funds, LEADING TO THE INSTIGATED by Local Authorities, their staff and their officers fraudulent misrepresentations to the owners of properties and thereby the CONSTRUCTIVELY ENGINEERED FRAUDS THROUGH RELIANCE ON THE COURTS TO PROCESS, to entertain, to endorse and to impose on the helpless properties owners ARROGANT FRAUD and theft of properties. NOTE: The explicit appeal lodged at court in the instance we point to, DID CAUSE the government in the United Kingdom to announce the Bill of Rights, almost 40 YEARS AFTER signing up to the European Convention on Human Rights.
    5.    *July 2011, the Intellectual Prostitutes in the United Kingdom afforded us the avenues and the means that SOULD PROVIDE all victims of the ORGANISED ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES (in fact the abusers of judicial chair occupation) THE WAY FORWARD. If ever the victims wished, desired to EXPOSE & CHALLENGE OPENLY the abusers of public office and the courts facilities, their chance and oppportunity was pointed to by us when the facility for free website space was first created by Andrew Yiannides in conjunction with the USA corporation that contracted with Andrew to make available such facilities under the human-rights.org banner. Many the alleged victim challengers who signed up to the fcailities / provisions and conveniently failed to interlink / connect with other members for and because of other reasons than the need to challenge and expose collectively the abusers of the courts facilities as we cover in our pages. Many the alleged victim-challengers who simply indulged in all manner of promotions to targeted 'newbies' to NEW VICTIMS of the organised abuse of the courts facilities for fraud aplenty, especially after the new victims joined the human-rights.org Community on Line. [*Link from here to evidence when such services to the system's operatives were the main objective of the corrupted]
    6.    xxx
    7.    xxx
    8.    xxx